|
|
The Issue
After the capture and trial of notorious rapist Henry Taiden, who was convicted of the rape of over 50 women in the past two years a debate has emerged on how he should be punished.
The Debate
"That psychopath should be castrated!" cries rape victim Jack Longfellow, "The agony he put me through must be punished with a means that will ensure that no human being will ever go through what I did! If castration is used more often in these cases you will see rape drop to nothing!"
[Accept]
"I understand that this is a terrible time for the poor victims in this case," says defense attorney Roxanne Jefferson, "However, the answer is not to revert back to the dark ages. Instead, we should focus on rehabilitation of all criminals in our prison system."
[Accept]
"Everyone knows re-education is a waste of money, we shouldn't go soft on these crooks!" says CEO Billy-Bob Bush of the People Trading Corporation. "Simply place all rapists and criminals in Perneses into forced labor under the management of our company to serve out their sentences. When we're through with them, they won't even think of jaywalking, much less harming another person. We get cheap labor, and these crooks get put straight. Everybody benefits... well, except the crooks."
[Accept]
Well. Listening to Argument #1.. and assessing the situation.. leads me to believe that the "offender" needs to meet my friend Gavin instead of having an extremity chopped off. How would that work? ..You know, having "it" chopped off? I need someone to enlighten me on that. How would gay-rape work? Seriously, think about it. Also.. um.. sending the "offender" to prison would only make this particular case worse, correct?
< sarcasm>My goodness! Being a ruler comes with so many silly decisions!< /sarcasm>
~scribbled by jen sometime around 4:46 PM